Distance from the panel: how far this judge's placements sit from the panel's skated result; lower is closer. The distance measures how far this judge's placements sit from the panel's skated result — as a share of the field (one place in a 3-couple final is half the places available; in a 12-couple final an eleventh), and in raw places.It describes how a judge marks; judges are not ranked.Panel lean below combines recalls and finals per competitor: positive means more favorable judging than the other judges.
Loading panel lean…
2 competitions · 3 events · 100 marks
Moscow, Russian Federation 2017 · 30 marks · −2.8 pts vs their overall 17.5%
Each dot is one competition; larger dots carry more marks. The line is a moving average over 7 competitions, weighted by marks; the dashed rule is this judge's overall figure. Lower means closer to the panel's skated result. Skated finals only.
| Mean |placement − panel result| at this competition, divided by the places available (field − 1). Lower = closer to the panel. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moscow, Russian Federation 2017 | Dec 1, 2017 | 1 | 30 | 14.7% |
| Pieve Di Cento, Italy 2017 | Mar 23, 2017 | 2 | 70 | 21.0% |
| Vilnius, Lithuania 2016 | Dec 2, 2016 | 4 | 120 | 21.0% |
| Warsaw, Poland 2016 | Nov 5, 2016 | 1 | 30 | 6.7% |
| Moscow, Russian Federation 2016 | Oct 26, 2016 | 1 | 30 | 32.7% |
| Sochi, Russian Federation 2016 | Jun 22, 2016 | 4 | 185 | 14.8% |
| Paris, France 2016 | May 27, 2016 | 5 | 180 | 16.7% |
| Antalya, Türkiye 2016 | Apr 30, 2016 | 10 | 264 | 13.2% |
| Megeve, France 2016 | Apr 9, 2016 | 7 | 235 | 19.2% |
| Krasnodar, Russian Federation 2016 | Apr 2, 2016 | 4 | 125 | 6.4% |
| Moscow Region, Russian Federation 2016 | Mar 24, 2016 | 2 | 60 | 16.7% |
| Brno, Czechia 2016 | Mar 18, 2016 | 3 | 90 | 8.9% |
| Pieve Di Cento, Italy 2016 | Mar 11, 2016 | 2 | 60 | 9.3% |
| Madrid, Spain 2016 | Jan 15, 2016 | 4 | 120 | 25.7% |
| Vilnius, Lithuania 2015 | Dec 5, 2015 | 4 | 120 | 14.3% |
| Riga, Latvia 2015 | Oct 31, 2015 | 1 | 30 | 4.0% |
| Moscow, Russian Federation 2015 | Oct 22, 2015 | 2 | 60 | 20.7% |
| Riga, Latvia 2015 | Apr 18, 2015 | 2 | 60 | 16.7% |
| Megeve, France 2015 | Apr 10, 2015 | 3 | 90 | 29.3% |
| Alytus, Lithuania 2015 | Mar 14, 2015 | 4 | 120 | 18.2% |
| Helsinki, Finland 2015 | Mar 6, 2015 | 6 | 185 | 24.2% |
| Antwerp, Belgium 2015 | Jan 30, 2015 | 4 | 150 | 17.5% |
| Lillestrom, Norway 2014 | Dec 6, 2014 | 3 | 90 | 20.9% |
| Minsk, Belarus 2014 | Nov 29, 2014 | 1 | 30 | 4.0% |
| Vienna, Austria 2014 | Nov 14, 2014 | 3 | 90 | 11.6% |
| Riga, Latvia 2014 | Oct 31, 2014 | 2 | 60 | 18.0% |
| Brasov, Romania 2014 | Sep 20, 2014 | 2 | 90 | 11.6% |
| Singapore, Singapore 2014 | Jun 28, 2014 | 2 | 60 | 8.3% |
| Olsztyn, Poland 2014 | Jun 7, 2014 | 6 | 180 | 15.4% |
| Paris, France 2014 | May 23, 2014 | 6 | 215 | 18.3% |
| Riga, Latvia 2014 | May 1, 2014 | 1 | 30 | 25.3% |
| Cambrils, Spain 2014 | Apr 17, 2014 | 5 | 180 | 25.2% |
| Megeve, France 2014 | Apr 11, 2014 | 11 | 370 | 15.4% |
| Brno, Czechia 2014 | Mar 14, 2014 | 9 | 276 | 20.1% |
| Madrid, Spain 2014 | Jan 10, 2014 | 7 | 210 | 15.0% |
| Bourg-en-Bresse, France 2013 | Dec 21, 2013 | 5 | 150 | 15.5% |
| Warsaw, Poland 2013 | Nov 9, 2013 | 3 | 95 | 24.6% |
| Riga, Latvia 2013 | Nov 2, 2013 | 3 | 90 | 14.2% |
| Ancona, Italy 2013 | Oct 18, 2013 | 13 | 390 | 20.0% |
| Moscow, Russian Federation 2013 | Sep 28, 2013 | 3 | 95 | 18.3% |