Early preview. Help us improve

The competitive field

Professional Latin Rankings

Couples ranked by their BallroomRank score. Reading the table. Rank follows the displayed score, highest first. One- and five-year boards show the current score; ten-year, all-time and historical boards show each partnership’s score after its last event in the window. Scores are shared across age and association filters and do not carry a calibrated ± uncertainty estimate. Pro-Am and Mixed-Am rank students, with their teacher shown underneath. All couples puts Professional, Amateur and Same-sex / Equality couples on one board (each couple counted once, with its events across the three); students are not included because their scores come from a separate model.How this score works. Partnership scores in all five styles combine faster-changing couple strength with recent form and experience. A small model trained on full standings adjusts those strengths. Recorded elimination ties remain tied evidence. Likely non-participation is screened using the same rule for every couple. Scores are comparable within a dance style; judge-specific adjustments are not included.Age groups. An age group lists the couples who competed together in it during the activity window, with the same overall score they have on the full board. Pro-Am and Mixed-Am qualify students with any teacher; the teacher is never rated. A, A1 and other labels stay separate; age cutoffs depend on the event. Over 35 and other explicit cutoffs stay separate from numbered Senior tiers unless the event states a tier. Unknown ages are not inferred.Started in. Ranks dancers, not couples, among others who started in the same group: the group most of their events belonged to in their first twelve months (Collegiate, Juvenile/Junior, Youth, Adult, Senior or Pro-Am student), in five-year bands of their first competition. Pro-Am starters are ranked by their own BallroomRank score as a student; everyone else by their most recent partnership's score, the one their profile leads with. A professional start or a first season without age, collegiate or pro-am labels is not classified.How rankings work: methodology, data sources and limitations →

Results imported Oct 18, 2026, 7:04 PM UTC · Latin scores as of Oct 18, 2026 Results last imported: Oct 18, 2026, 7:04 PM UTC.Recent results and scores update separately. New results may appear before the next BallroomRank score calculation includes them.Latin BallroomRank scores as of Oct 18, 2026, published Oct 18, 2026, 2:48 PM UTC.Full methodology, data sources and limitations →

FiltersPast 1 yr · 1+ events

Choose a starting group to rank individual dancers who began in the same category and years. Choose Any start to return to partnership rankings.

Score methodBallroomRank score

An association lists the couples who danced under that body in the window; their score is the same on every board. Each competition is tagged with the body that sanctioned it, and each of those rolls up to a world body: WDC (its championships and member councils, such as the NDCA in the US and the WDC Amateur League); WDSF (formerly IDSF: its competitions and national member federations, such as USA Dance); WDO (World Dance Organisation championships and recognised events); Indep. (independent circuits, including UK teacher associations and US collegiate). Picking one narrows the board to competitors who danced at least one event in the active window under it — so a couple who competes on both circuits appears on both boards. The score never changes: it is the same number on every board, because scoring each circuit separately would cut the pools apart and make the numbers incomparable.Coverage is deliberately incomplete. A comp is only tagged where the evidence is explicit — the body's own results feed, its name in the competition title, or a hand-verified entry. Most national and regional European comps reach us with nothing but a name and a city, so their sanctioning body is genuinely unknown; those count toward no association board.